That is what I've done. I just didn't bother to cleanly rename the package.
My original thinking was to integrate the changes into portmon to simplify
future maintenance but it would certainly go quicker as a new monitor. I can
probably put the effort in to create sslmon.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pedroche, Raúl" <raul pedroche at colt-telecom.es>
To: <nocol-users at navya com>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:49 AM
Subject: RE: [snips-users] portmon with ssl support.
> Why not compile it as a separate binary, let's say sslmon or sportmon?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ean Kingston [mailto:ean at hedron org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 9:51 PM
> To: nocol-users at navya com
> Subject: [snips-users] portmon with ssl support.
>
>
> Folks,
>
> I needed to add https monitoring to our monitoring system at work so I
> adapted portmon to work through ssl. It (obviously) needs the openssl
> libraries to compile with and it doesn't allow non-ssl connections
anymore.
[snip]
P.S.
Sorry about the delay in replying. I tried to send it from work but the
SMTP server at work won't let me send from my personal domain.
|