[Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] |
RE: nocol-users mozbot talks to nocol
|
This presents a good idea for a NOCOL messaging system. Has anyone any experience with a CORBA server? Perhaps this would be a good platform for such a system since some are free. Thank you, Jonathan A. Zdziarski Director - MIS NetRail, inc. 230 Peachtree St. Suite 1700 Atlanta, GA 30303 404-522-5400 x240 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-nocol-users@navya.com [mailto:owner-nocol-users@navya.com]On > Behalf Of Velocet > Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 4:32 PM > To: nocol-users@navya.com > Subject: nocol-users mozbot talks to nocol > > > Well, mozbot listens to nocol anyway. ;) > > Good timing on releasing the SQL status database, JUST as I finish coding, > d'oh! > > At any rate, my company hangs out in irc alot, so that people dont have to > yell from office to office, and when people are at remote sites or > telecommuting, we can maintain conversations without having people > interupting eachother with phone calls. We even have some savvy customers > trained to bother us in a client channel too. ;) Of course we > have our own irc > servers. > > We sometimes dont notice that some nocol state is changing before we get a > huge number of pages. Even so, our paging system (the telco) can be > unreliable. I want to ensure we do NOT miss any alert statuses in > nocol. And > in fact, I want a subset of nocol states to be flagged in some way without > resorting to the cumbersome and intrusive pager system. If someone is > around on the irc, they can go fix it, when its in error or warning state, > because its not worth paging someone who's out visiting relatives on the > weekend, though it should eventually be fixed. Email is also unreliable in > terms of WHEN people read it, as well as their powers of ignoring > important > email. ;) > > So for us, IRC seems like a good place to give alerts on things that > we consider not ever worthy of a critical flag. (A good example > is diskspace. We consider 98-99% to be critical on most our systems > because they have 20-50 gigs on most of them now. Having 'only' 1 gig > free is not an emergency. So its not worth it to page someone because > disk space is in error state. But its worth it to indicate it in irc. > > I am still tweaking it a bit, and will be done in a day or two, > and will be handing out urls then. > > Just wondering what else people want added to this while Im at it. > > Right now I have this coded and working: > > - reporting changes to any state (from I to W/E/C or back to I) > > - allowing user to request output of any state to channel or back > in private > /msg (I do not allow a full INFO report back in channels) > > I am going to tweak this a bit to allow a simple limit - even I can see > now how much state fluctuates - I NEVER noticed this before. Its kinda > interesting - but its alot of traffic in some ways, with every warning > popping up and disappearing another 2-3 minutes later. I can make a limit > so that only Errors or full Critical status are reported. > > I am trying to get the exception stuff working a bit better now, to allow > the bot to report on and insert exceptions much as the web interface does. > However, the web interface exceptions do NOT seem to be sticking for me > (on subsequent reload they're gone). I think there's a permission problem > writing to disk, but the exceptions file is owned by the same user that > owns the apache process. Strange. > > I am also going to allow the user to request a report of all > states (below a > certain level) from a specific machine, or all states (below a certain > level) of a trait ('varname') from all machines. Or one specific machine's > state for a certain trait. > > The one last thing I think we need is to allow a nag config to be setup so > that a periodic nagging over an existing state can be reiterated again > (currently the bot only volonteers info on state changes). I can also > allow (a) target user(s) to be nagged specifically about various problems. > > A variation of that is allowing different levels of reporting for > different > targets: changes to/from "critical" only to the channel, and error > to all the admins via private /msg, and 'warning' to the jr admins only > via /msg. Hmm this could come in VERY handy. (/me grabs his whip with > the jr admin's name on it.) > > Mozbot is from the mozilla project, and I've neutered a bunch of its > functions (the tinderbox compilation engine reporting for eg) > since they're > specific to the Mozilla groups' desires. However, it maintains a few > interesting things such as reporting slashdot and freshmeat headlines > as they appear, et al. (These can be removed easily as well.) > > The next 'version' of this may see this bot cleaned up MASSIVELY, because > the original code was a travesty. :) As well, I will be > interfacing with the > new SQL database to get a report of state once I get that working. > > Here's a sample of my current output: > > <m:#baz> hadrian.velocet NetOErr=7 chg:I from W (since 12/21 16:04) > <m:#baz> water.planeteer NetColl=0 chg:I from W (since 12/21 16:14) > > (oh the output string can be configured as well) > > /kc > -- > Ken Chase, Director Operations Velocet > Communications Inc. > math@velocet.ca > Toronto CANADA > -- > "Sometimes two [harmless] words, when put together, strike fear in the > hearts of men -- Microsoft Wallet." - > Dave Gilbert > |