[Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] |
Re: Multiple Dependencies (as requested)
|
the problem with a 'hidden' field in the database is that it's not the place for it...if one person wants to hide a view and another doesn't, it automatically makes the field obsolite. i think the 'hidden' information should be kept in either a cookie, /tmp file, or whatever type of file a view process initializes to store its variables. On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Rick Beebe wrote: > "Jonathan A. Zdziarski" wrote: > > > > All involved, please let me know what you think of this below. I believe > > it will be the optimal level of multiple dependency logic for our > > application allowing you to form complex AND and OR routines, rather than > > just OR routines. > > One of the things I added to the web interface, that doesn't exist in > netconsole, was a status field and a 'hidden' field. I had to use the > somewhat kludgy etc/updates file to do that. Since we're talking about a > redesign, how about adding those to the database to make it easy to add that > functionality to any of the interfaces. > > -- > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Rick Beebe (203) 785-6416 > Manager, Systems & Network Engineering FAX: (203) 785-3978 > ITS-Med Client & Technology Services Richard.Beebe@yale.edu > Yale University School of Medicine > P.O. Box 208078, New Haven, CT 06520-8078 > _______________________________________________________________________ > Thank you, Jonathan A. Zdziarski Sr. Systems Administrator Netrail, inc. 888.NET.RAIL x240 http://www.netrail.net |