On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 04:04:08PM -0400, Velocet wrote:
>I am all for getting everything to my liking of course, just want to do
>as little work as possible to get there (and still get all the glory of
>being part of a project that produced a working useful network monitoring
>system).
I can sympathise with this. :-)
>If we're serious we should spend a couple weeks taking stock and discussing
>design flaws in other packages, then start working on deciding wether
>to attack nocol, some other package, or to start from scratch. It would
>also be good not to duplicate the efforts of the Gnome network monitoring
>people's efforts, tho there may be some over lap.
Well, looking at the netsaint.org pages, there are already a _lot_ of
monitoring packages out there... could take quite a while to evaluate
them all.
>This mailing list may not be the place to continue these discussions
>after a while - we can make another mailing list relatively easily
>then. Hopefully til we decide what we're doing, we can discuss nocol, its
>merits, failures and other packages here.
I'll be happy to provide a mailing list, cvs repository, and whatever
else seems relevant.
Roger
--
Roger Burton West roger@firedrake.org
ACTING IN A PRIVATE CAPACITY
Network Operations Centre Team Leader Direct Connection
|