[Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] |
Re: nsmon question
|
On Thu, Aug 27/98, TTSG <ttsg@ttsg.com> wrote: > > > > I had problems with the new 'AUTH' statements; even when my servers were > > authoritative they would come up. I removed the AUTH statement and it > > works OK (of course you lose the functionality that the AUTH statement > > gives you) > > > I think you've got it implemented wrong. > > What this says is "I have a domain, istar.ca . The first server > thats authoritative for is is called mail, its at 154.11.136.66. The > second server is called news, its at 154.11.136.66. The third.............." > > I believe it only has the ability to tell you that the server is > authoritative for the domain, not hosts in the domain. Hmm. I'm not disputing you're correct in this assessment, but it's curious that nsmon has been running like this for a week or so and only today did these go critical at the same time the nameserver in question is returning non-authoritive answers for those hosts. The man page does seem to imply you are correct though. I wonder why they only went critical today. Would anyone else find the way I thought it was supposed to work more useful? -- Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity. GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y* |